The Circle of Care, the Circle of Trust, and Nonviolence

It is nonviolence only when we love those that hate us.Gandhi

Today is Martin Luther King’s birthday. I am happy to honor him today and every day by continuing to dedicate myself to a deep exploration of nonviolence.

I have written before about the idea of expanding what I called the Circle of Care, the collection of people in our lives that we care about. I suggested expanding it in two directions. One is to include ourselves as a way to overcome deeply ingrained habits that lead people to give up on their needs in relationships. Instead of caring only about the other person’s needs, expanding the circle of care leads to putting my own needs front and center while also caring for the other person. The other direction of expanding the circle of care is about including more and more people and groups within it.

Expanding circleMore recently, I was struck by the connection I saw between this notion and my continued investigations into the implications of nonviolence. It now appears to me that one way of understanding nonviolence is as having an infinite circle of care: there isn’t any person or group that is beyond the pale.

This is a discipline, not a one-time decision. Our automatic, habitual reactions may persist, and our commitment to nonviolence continually invites us to pause and open our hearts again. And again. And again. As often as necessary until the habit shifts. It doesn’t mean we will always, or even ever, succeed in including everyone, truly everyone. It only means that when we don’t succeed, we know it’s our own heart or habit limitation. Mourning my inability to live up to my values at all times is, in itself, a big part of what my own commitment to nonviolence consists of.

Although growing into this commitment may be a slow and gradual process, the commitment itself is not a spectrum. This commitment is complete. As soon as we declare any one person or group not deserving of care, we instantly leave the world of nonviolence. It’s all in the difference between believing that anyone is beyond the pale and believing everyone is included and knowing that we cannot necessarily live into it.

Every time I encounter Gandhi’s line about loving those that hate us I am freshly shocked to recognize the wisdom of going directly for the extreme, as that clarifies the magnitude of the task. It is a task I lovingly accept as my own for the rest of my journey.

The Circle of Trust

Even if the opponent plays him [/her] false twenty times, the Satyagrahi [person deeply committed to nonviolence] is ready to trust him [/her] the twenty-first time, for an implicit trust in human nature is the very essence of his [/her] creed. – Gandhi

I started thinking about the circle of trust only recently. Again, a quote from Gandhi sparked the deep engagement I’ve had. A lot of my learning and creating happens when I take a word, a sentence, a paragraph, and apply my all to grasping it. I had seen this quote from Gandhi many times before I finally began to fully imagine what it means.

The first thing that became clear to me is that Gandhi is inviting us to consider the possibility of expanding our circle of trust in addition to our circle of care, making them both infinite. I recognized instantly that expanding the circle of trust to infinity is a human impossibility unless I change my understanding of what I mean by trust.

Just as much as expanding the circle of care doesn’t mean we suddenly like everyone’s company and want to be their best friends, expanding the circle of trust doesn’t mean anything like a Pollyanna belief that even after twenty times of cheating the person would, suddenly, not cheat.

Rather, the kind of trust that I read into Gandhi’s quote is faith in the mystery of being human. It’s the overarching conviction that, no matter what happened until now, human beings remain redeemable; that the possibility remains that we can reach someone’s heart even if we haven’t, even if we don’t now know how. It’s the fundamental recognition that, regardless of what this other person has done, they have the same needs that we have and are made of the same fabric.

Without this kind of trust, nonviolence would crumble as a strategic approach to creating change. Because nonviolence rests on the faith, and ultimately knowledge, that nonviolent means have the most chance of creating change through reaching human hearts. If we don’t have any of that faith, we would simply be too tempted to strike.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

3 thoughts on “The Circle of Care, the Circle of Trust, and Nonviolence

  1. Elisabeth Scharbaum

    Loved this article! All of it and especially in the closing lines “… faith, ultimately knowledge, that nonviolent means have the most chance of creating change through reaching human hearts”. I think so, too. Thank you for the encouragement.

    Reply
  2. Lynne Aune

    Hi Mickey I absolutely agree with this theoretically and emotionally but how do we deal with groups of people who are committed to destroying other people who don’t have their belief system? I.e. Terrorists who sincerely believe their way is the only way and are willing to die for that. For Many of these folks what they have been taught about their world versus the rest of the world is the absolute truth. I don’t doubt that they have the same needs that I do but I suspect their hearts have been closed to any other way but what they have been taught. How do we reach folks from that way of living and believing? Plus most of us don’t even share their language which in itself is a barrier to sharing compassion with them.

    I would very much enjoy hearing what you or any other readers of this blog have to say about this conundrum.

    Hopefully,
    Lynne Aune

    Reply
  3. Paul Kahawatte

    Widening our circles of care for me also means looking for ways in which our actions or choices are impacted by any limitations to full care, respect or empathy for other animals.
    I believe that Nonviolence entails dissolving the boundaries or filters of care that are constructed on the basis of species, and that a world in which the needs of all fully matter fully includes those who take forms other than Human. I would like to hear any responses to this way of looking at these questions.

    Reply

Leave a Reply